KACE Product Support Question
Kace- Replication Shares and RSAs
There has been some discussion in my office about replication shares. We currently have about 16,000 machines. Of these 5,000 machines get software pushes every month or so ranging from 300 MB - 800 MB in size. We will be utilizing patching here in the next few months as well, moving off of our current patching solution for those 5,000.
My question is this. Is there anyone that chooses not to use replication shares, and if so why? Can you describe your machine count, and environment? How often are you doing pushes with an average file size.
The same question for those of you that do utilize them... machine count, environment, bandwith, how many do you have.
The same for RSAs if used.
I am aware of the setup, and what both Rep Shares and RSAs do. I'm just looking for a general consensus here.